Login to Your Account

Free Recharge

  • XAT revaluates 92,000 entrance test papers, declares result on monday

    xlri xat 2013 reevaluated result
    In a first, XLRI Jamshedpur has reevaluated all 92,000 entrance test papers following just two complaints from the students. The institute declared the reevaluated results yesterday. All previous results declared earlier now stand nullified.

    Click here to get your XAT 2013 score card.

    XAT was held on January 6, 2013, and the results declared on January 17. The scores were particularly low in the quantitative techniques (QT) section paper when compared with the corresponding marks in answer keys published by different coaching institutes. XLRI received two complaints from students who claimed there had been a technical error and their QT scores were erroneous.

    The decision is significant coming as it does at a time when top B-schools do not allow their aspirants to apply for a re-evaluation. Like the CAT, XAT scores are accepted by 91 other B-schools across India.

    "One of the two complaints was apparent without any basis. But then when I looked at the other complaint, I realized there was probably a technical error in the computer programme. If there is an error, we cannot be choosy and change result of only those who had complained. We decided to have a relook at all the results as the emphasis of an exam must be on correctness and fairness," said Vishwa Ballabh, admission Chairperson.

    The Institute's director and board agreed to release the fresh results. The revised scores and percentile of all candidates were published on XLRI website on Monday. The minimum cut-off placed by the XLRI for the QT section is down from 90% to 76.2%. The new scores have relatively fallen for every students and will affect admissions in every B-school.

    "The topper has been affected a bit and other students down the line have been affected a bit more," explained Ballabh. Sources were very clear if there was a major mistake. After cross checking with answer keys, it seems the problem of unexpectedly low marks was not faced by all the test takers, but about 10% of the candidates. That, however, altered the percentile and ranking of almost everyone.