Close
Login to Your Account
Faadooengineers
View RSS Feed

Software Engineers BLOG

Software Engineers Blog: Shotgun Marketing vs Focussed Marketing

Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
When I purchased my first house the real estate agent we used to help guide us in our search enjoyed “showing” us various properties with many different features. One house had a nice backyard with a HUGE side yard that was paved with cement and was probably 20’ wide by 60’ deep. The agent repeadidly emphasized to us how wonderful the house was because of it’s ability to park a large recreational vehicle. She kept emphasizing how wonderful the RV parking feature was and how it was so unique and rare. She couldn’t understand why we weren’t as equally enthused.

Finally one day she asked why we weren’t as estatic as she was about the RV parking feature. I replied “we don’t have an RV, therefore it doesn’t matter”

I share this because like you, I’m involved with my fair share of “customer workshops” that cover a multitude of topics that can last 3-4 + hours at a time. While I understand and appreciate the concept of staging these all encompassing sessions to introduce suspects / prospects to the wide range of solutions our firm provides, I often wonder how many of the recipients that sit through one of these 150 slide presentations think to themselves “I don’t have any use for <fill in the blank>, why are they spending so much of my time showing me <fill in the blank> benefits?”

Should we really discuss MDM, Oracle, SAP, Infra services, ETS and testing all during the same gigantic meeting hoping to gain a “yes, please tell me more” from a participant? Wouldn’t a more focused and thoughtful approach involve targeted and specific questions in a 1:1 or small group setting over the course of several meetings PRIOR to a big show and tell session, to allow for a deeper understanding of the clients business BEFORE we decide to present solutions hoping to generate a POC? I was part of a call that involved 15 + IT Experts from different vertical sales teams and different delivery organizations from around the world via web ex, in person, and conference call. On the prospects side they involved well over 25 people from various disciplines (operations, finance, IT, etc). This call lasted approximately four hours and at various times you could hear dogs barking, car horns honking, childrens voices, snoring (yes snoring), and all other sorts of interesting noises. My portion of the call didn’t start until hour three and lasted for 25 minutes. At the conclusion of the call, an hour later, the action item list was a mile long. No business has yet to be generated from this call.

I was part of a another call recently where the topic was focused on a large project along with testing. The account had other needs as well, but this sales rep elected to follow a more focused discovery session. The call involved only three resources from my company and four resources from the prospects IT team. It lasted 1.5 hours which allowed us to delve deeply into their organizational goals and to learn about their current challenges. We used this info to craft and refine our discussion points during the presentation. We spent more time on the points that really seemed to matter to the prospects while barely discussing or ignoring points that weren’t of much interest (ie: RV parking). By using a focused approach we were able to learn more about their decision making criteria, project specifics that only became understandable after several detailed questions, and other tactical issues that wouldn’t have been brought forth in a larger forum. A POC was the direct result of the discussion.

Am I saying that large “show and tell” four hour sessions should never be used? Not at all. I’m sure there are some cases where this is an appropriate approach to use.

We are an innovative company and we are continually expanding our solution offerings to our clients. Being a sales rep is definitely a daunting task especially with such an abundant portfolio of solution options to choose from to structure a “next” meeting. The potential for customer workshops that last hours and hours involving discussions on a multitude of only slightly related topics is certainly tempting. While using this shot gun approach can be easy to implement, my experience has shown that it’s not the most impactful, or a focused enough strategy at a client level to gain a deep understanding of their business. By defaulting and using a “throw stuff on the wall and see what sticks” approach in our presentation, we don’t provide ourselves the time to really learn the clients business. When we spend the time to really learn their business we are able to gain insights that can help us to craft unique solutions which themselves act as differentiators. Providing something other than a “me too” response can be the difference between winning and losing

As consultants and delivery people it’s our duty to ensure that we are presenting our firm in the best light possible to all suspects. Tailoring the BEST approach to fit each and every clients unique situation ultimately allows us to provide the differentiation necessary to truly be the IT partner our clients want and need us to be.
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

Trackbacks


Send Birthday Wish
Send Birthday Wish
  • Er. P.K. meena
    Branch : Electrical Engineering

    Er. P.K. meena

  • elijahfunmi
    Branch : Information Technology Engineering

    elijahfunmi

  • susheel pote
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    susheel pote

  • soumya ranjan mala
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    soumya ranjan mala

  • sajin calicut
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    sajin calicut

  • girish_sai
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    girish_sai

  • shree5051
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    shree5051

  • sravan.patel
    Branch : Information Technology Engineering

    sravan.patel

  • lovekush
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    lovekush

  • debraj005
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    debraj005

  • Numan Ali
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    Numan Ali

  • edilmendoza
    Branch : Electrical Engineering

    edilmendoza

  • dpkkmr98

    dpkkmr98

  • sarvesh2009
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    sarvesh2009

  • prani135
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    prani135

  • Md Mazharul Haque

    Md Mazharul Haque

  • ASHISH PANIGRAHI
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    ASHISH PANIGRAHI

  • sai prashanth
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    sai prashanth

  • ankita rauthan
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    ankita rauthan

  • shiva411
    Branch : Some other branch

    shiva411

  • sai.nallapu
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    sai.nallapu

  • rahul_ranjan
    Branch : Electrical Engineering

    rahul_ranjan

  • mubashshir123
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    mubashshir123

  • sugunaraj

    sugunaraj

  • aditisingh
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    aditisingh

  • akki0420
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    akki0420

  • varundeoghare
    Branch : Bio-Tech Engineering

    varundeoghare

  • upender786
    Branch : Some other branch

    upender786

  • engineerAbhishek
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    engineerAbhishek

  • ZebaNaaz
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    ZebaNaaz

  • sahan

    sahan

  • justogesh
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    justogesh

  • ravishek
    Branch : Electrical Engineering

    ravishek

  • sri ganesg
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    sri ganesg

  • mohammed saleh
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    mohammed saleh

  • nisar46
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    nisar46

  • mohit_haryani
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    mohit_haryani

  • Mohd saddam

    Mohd saddam

  • yogender1990
    Branch : Information Technology Engineering

    yogender1990

  • swativ80
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    swativ80

  • srireni9
    Branch : Information Technology Engineering

    srireni9

  • gourav chavan
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    gourav chavan

  • nandigam.saikumar
    Branch : Instrumentation Engineering

    nandigam.saikumar

  • hellseekers
    Branch : Information Technology Engineering

    hellseekers

  • ashu777
    Branch : Electrical Engineering

    ashu777

  • Rajveer Kalsi
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    Rajveer Kalsi

  • sahan

    sahan

  • rmnkmr086
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    rmnkmr086

  • satish chandra

    satish chandra

  • Purva Khandelwal

    Purva Khandelwal

  • ranju.519
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    ranju.519

  • nileshkumar_yadav
    Branch : Instrumentation Engineering

    nileshkumar_yadav

  • sayandeep

    sayandeep

  • sandeep_patil
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    sandeep_patil

  • krishnakumargopal
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    krishnakumargopal

  • mrulove11
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    mrulove11

  • rohan s
    Branch : THIS DOES NOT APPLY ON ME!

    rohan s

  • ajendra
    Branch : Instrumentation Engineering

    ajendra

  • pradeep1232123
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    pradeep1232123

  • N.priyanka

    N.priyanka

  • kumar manish

    kumar manish

  • mayank89
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    mayank89

  • krishnakk73
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    krishnakk73

  • ABDULLAH SHADMAN
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    ABDULLAH SHADMAN

  • Apoorv Ankur

    Apoorv Ankur

  • naveenvipparla

    naveenvipparla

  • prerana sharma
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    prerana sharma

  • chandan.kumar
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    chandan.kumar

  • pankaj chaudhary 1
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    pankaj chaudhary 1

  • Sadhana.S
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    Sadhana.S

  • gokarna
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    gokarna

  • mina89
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    mina89

  • Rachu Thakur
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    Rachu Thakur

  • chera
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    chera

  • avgsh
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    avgsh

  • Deepak Ramana
    Branch : Information Technology Engineering

    Deepak Ramana

  • sch4494
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    sch4494

  • pradeep kumar singh
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    pradeep kumar singh

  • shivamnarayan
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    shivamnarayan

  • ManikandanA
    Branch : Electrical Engineering

    ManikandanA

  • kailas dhatrak

    kailas dhatrak

  • sheik46
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    sheik46

  • anchalsethi
    Branch : Electronics Engineering

    anchalsethi

  • RAVI059
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    RAVI059

  • prashanth.k
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    prashanth.k

  • ashish020
    Branch : Civil Engineering

    ashish020

  • vaitheswari
    Branch : Some other branch

    vaitheswari

  • 2011183
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    2011183

  • kashazamare
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    kashazamare

  • sathiraju srikanth
    Branch : Aeronautical Engineering

    sathiraju srikanth

  • Er. P.K. meena
    Branch : Electrical Engineering

    Er. P.K. meena

  • shankar5032

    shankar5032

  • jeet kumar
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    jeet kumar

  • Rajesh Yadav

    Rajesh Yadav

  • saurabh1tna

    saurabh1tna

  • ZebaNaaz
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    ZebaNaaz

  • ZebaNaaz
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    ZebaNaaz

  • monalisa222
    Branch : Computer Science Engineering

    monalisa222

  • BilahariJayaseelan
    Branch : THIS DOES NOT APPLY ON ME!

    BilahariJayaseelan

  • sheraz_ali9219
    Branch : Mechanical Engineering

    sheraz_ali9219

×

Send Birthday wish

Send Wish