FE-Logo
  • Home
  • Study Material
  • Non-Deterministic Finite Automation
    • Introduction to Compiler
    • The Structure of a Compiler
    • Intermediate Code Generation
    • Building a Compiler
    • Applications of Compiler
    • Optimizations for Computer Architectures
    • Design of New Computer Architectures
    • Program Translations
    • Software Productivity Tools
    • Programming Language Basics
    • Minimisation of DFAs
    • Explicit Access Control
    • Parameter Passing Mechanisms
    • Introduction to Lexical Analysis
    • Regular expressions
    • Short hands
    • Nondeterministic finite automata
    • Converting a regular expression to an NFA
    • Deterministic finite automata
    • Converting an NFA to a DFA
    • The subset construction
    • Dead states
    • Lexers and lexer generators
    • Splitting the input stream
    • Lexical errors
    • Properties of regular languages
    • Limits to expressive power
    • The Role of the Lexical Analyzer
    • Input Buffering
    • Specification of Tokens
    • Operations on Languages
    • Regular Definitions and Extensions
    • Recognition of Tokens
    • The Lexical-Analyzer Generator Lex
    • Finite Automata
    • Construction of an NFA from a Regular Expression
    • Efficiency of String-Processing Algorithms
    • The Structure of the Generated Analyzer
    • Optimization of DFA-Based Pattern Matchers

  • Basic Parsing Techniques
    • Introduction to Syntax analysis
    • Context-free grammars
    • Writing context free grammars
    • Derivation
    • Syntax trees and ambiguity
    • Operator precedence
    • Writing ambiguous expression grammars
    • Other sources of ambiguity
    • Syntax analysis and Predictive parsing
    • Nullable and FIRST
    • Predictive parsing revisited
    • FOLLOW
    • LL(1) parsing
    • Methods for rewriting grammars for LL(1) parsing
    • SLR parsing
    • Constructions of SLR parse tables
    • Conflicts in SLR parse-tables
    • Using precedence rules in LR parse tables
    • Using LR-parser generators
    • Properties of context-free languages
    • Introduction to Syntax-Directed Translator
    • Evaluating an SDD at the Nodes of a Parse Tree
    • Evaluation Orders for SDD\'s
    • Ordering the Evaluation of Attributes
    • A larger example of calculating FIRST and FOLLOW
    • Syntax Definition
    • Associativity of Operators
    • Parse Trees
    • Ambiguity
    • Syntax-Directed Translation
    • Synthesized Attributes
    • Tree Traversals
    • Parsing
    • Predictive Parsing
    • Use e-Productions
    • Translator for Simple Expressions
    • Semantic Rules with Controlled Side Effects
    • Applications of Syntax-Directed Translation
    • The Structure of a Type of syntax
    • Switch-Statements
    • Syntax-Directed Translation Schemes
    • Postfix Translation Schemes
    • SDT\'s With Actions Inside Productions
    • Eliminating Left Recursion from SDT\'s
    • SDT\'s for L-Attributed Definitions
    • Implementing L-Attributed SDD\'s
    • On-The-Fly Code Generation
    • L-Attributed SDD\'s and LL Parsing
    • Bottom-Up Parsing of L-Attributed SDD\'s

  • Syntax-directed Translation
    • Register Allocation and Assignment
    • Semantic Analysis
    • Introduction to Intermediate Code Generation
    • Variants of Syntax Trees
    • Variants of Syntax Trees
    • The Value-Number Method for Constructing DAG\'s
    • Three-Address Code
    • Quadruples
    • Triples
    • Static Single-Assignment Form
    • Types and Declarations
    • Type Equivalence
    • Sequences of Declarations
    • Translation of Expressions
    • Incremental Translation
    • Addressing Array Elements
    • Translation of Array References
    • Type Checking
    • Type Conversions
    • Overloading of Functions and Operators
    • Type Inference and Polymorphic Functions
    • Algorithm for Unification
    • Control Flow
    • Flow-of-Control Statements
    • Control-Flow Translation of Boolean Expressions
    • Boolean Values and Jumping Code
    • Back patching
    • Backpatching for Boolean Expressions
    • Flow-of-Control Statements
    • Break-, Continue-, and Goto-Statements
    • Introduction to Run-Time Environments
    • Stack Allocation of Space
    • Activation Records
    • Calling Sequences
    • Variable-Length Data on the Stack
    • Access to Nonlocal Data on the Stack
    • Displays
    • Heap Management
    • Locality in Programs
    • Reducing Fragmentation
    • Managing and Coalescing Free Space
    • Manual Deallocation Requests
    • Reachability
    • Introduction to Garbage Collection
    • Reference Counting Garbage Collectors
    • Introduction to Trace-Based Collection
    • Basic Abstraction
    • Optimizing Mark-and-Sweep
    • Mark-and-Compact Garbage Collectors
    • Copying collectors
    • Short-Pause Garbage Collection
    • Incremental Reachability Analysis
    • Partial-Collection Basics
    • The Train Algorithm
    • Parallel and Concurrent Garbage Collection
    • Partial Object Relocation
    • Introduction Code Generation
    • Issues in the Design of a Code Generator
    • Instruction Selection
    • Register Allocation
    • The Target Language
    • Addresses in the Target Code
    • Stack Allocation
    • Run-Time Addresses for Names
    • Basic Blocks and Flow Graphs
    • Basic Blocks
    • Next-Use Information
    • Representation of Flow Graphs
    • Optimization of Basic Blocks
    • Dead Code Elimination
    • Representation of Array References
    • Pointer Assignments and Procedure Calls
    • A Simple Code Generator
    • The Code-Generation Algorithm
    • Design of the Function getReg
    • Peephole Optimization
    • Algebraic Simplification and Reduction in Strength
    • Register Assignment for Outer Loops
    • Instruction Selection by Tree Rewriting
    • Code Generation by Tiling an Input Tree
    • Pattern Matching by Parsing
    • General Tree Matching
    • Optimal Code Generation for Expressions
    • Evaluating Expressions with an Insufficient Supply of Registers
    • Dynamic Programming Code-Generation

  • Data Flow Analysis
    • The Lazy-Code-Motion Algorithm
    • Introduction to Machine-Independent Optimizations
    • The Dynamic Programming Algorithm
    • The Principal Sources of Optimization
    • Semantics-Preserving Transformations
    • Copy Propagation
    • Induction Variables and Reduction in Strength
    • Introduction to Data-Flow Analysis
    • The Data-Flow Analysis Schema
    • Reaching Definitions
    • Live-Variable Analysis
    • Available Expressions
    • Foundations of Data-Flow Analysis
    • Transfer Functions
    • The Iterative Algorithm for General Frameworks
    • Meaning of a Data-Flow Solution
    • Constant Propagation
    • Transfer Functions for the Constant-Propagation Framework
    • Partial-Redundancy Elimination
    • The Lazy-Code-Motion Problem
    • Loops in Flow Graphs
    • Depth-First Ordering
    • Back Edges and Reducibility
    • Natural Loops
    • Speed of Convergence of Iterative Data-Flow Algorithms
    • Region-Based Analysis
    • Necessary Assumptions About Transfer Functions
    • An Algorithm for Region-Based Analysis
    • Handling Non-reducible Flow Graphs
    • Symbolic Analysis
    • Data-Flow Problem Formulation
    • Region-Based Symbolic Analysis

  • Code Generation
    • Introduction to Software Pipelining of Loops
    • Matrix Multiply: An In-Depth Example
    • Software Pipelining of Loops
    • Introduction Instruction-Level Parallelism
    • Multiple Instruction Issue
    • A Basic Machine Model
    • Code-Scheduling Constraints
    • Finding Dependences Among Memory Accesses
    • Phase Ordering Between Register Allocation and Code Scheduling
    • Speculative Execution Support
    • Basic-Block Scheduling
    • List Scheduling of Basic Blocks
    • Global Code Scheduling
    • Upward Code Motion
    • Updating Data Dependences
    • Advanced Code Motion Techniques
    • Software Pipelining
    • Register Allocation and Code Generation
    • A Software-Pipelining Algorithm
    • Scheduling Cyclic Dependence Graphs
    • Improvements to the Pipelining Algorithms
    • Conditional Statements and Hardware Support for Software Pipelining
    • Basic Concepts of Parallelism and Locality
    • Parallelism in Applications
    • Loop-Level Parallelism
    • Introduction to Affine Transform Theory
    • Optimizations
    • Iteration Spaces
    • Affine Array Indexes
    • Controlling the Order of Execution
    • Changing Axes
    • Intermediate Code for Procedures
    • Data Reuse
    • Self Reuse
    • Self-Spatial Reuse
    • Array Data-Dependence Analysis
    • Integer Linear Programming
    • Heuristics for Solving Integer Linear Programs
    • Solving General Integer Linear Programs
    • Finding Synchronization-Free Parallelism
    • Affine Space Partitions
    • Space-Partition Constraints
    • Solving Space-Partition Constraints
    • A Simple Code-Generation Algorithm
    • Eliminating Empty Iterations
    • Synchronization Between Parallel Loops
    • The Parallelization Algorithm and Hierarchical Time
    • Pipelining
    • Solving Time-Partition Constraints by Farkas' Lemma
    • Code Transformations
    • Parallelism With Minimum Synchronization
    • Locality Optimizations
    • Partition Interleaving
    • Putting it All Together
    • Uses of Affine Transforms
    • Interprocedural Analysis
    • Context Sensitivity
    • Cloning-Based Context-Sensitive Analysis
    • Importance of Interprocedural Analysis
    • SQL Injection
    • A Logical Representation of Data Flow
    • Execution of Datalog Programs
    • Problematic Datalog Rules
    • A Simple Pointer-Analysis Algorithm
    • Flow Insensitivity
    • Context-Insensitive Interprocedural Analysis
    • Context-Sensitive Pointer Analysis
    • Adding Context to Datalog Rules
    • Datalog Implementation by BDD's
    • Relational Operations as BDD Operations

Branch : Computer Science and Engineering
Subject : Compiler design
Unit : Basic Parsing Techniques

Predictive parsing revisited


Introduction:

If the right-hand sides of the productions for a non-terminal have disjoint FIRST sets, we can use the next input symbol to choose among the productions. In Predictive parsing, we picked the empty production (if any) on any symbol that was not in the FIRST sets of the non-empty productions for the same non-terminal. We can extend this, so we in case of no matching FIRST sets can select a production if it is Nullable. The idea is that a Nullable production can derive the empty string, so the input symbol need not be read by the production itself. But if there are several Nullable productions, we have no way of choosing between them. Hence, we do not allow more than one production for a non-terminal to be Nullable.

We said in section 3.3.1 that our syntax analysis methods will detect ambiguous grammars. However, this is not true with the method as stated above: We can get unique choice of production even for some ambiguous grammars, including grammar 3.4. The syntax analysis will in this case just choose one of several possible syntax trees for a given input string. In many cases, we do not consider such behavior acceptable. In fact, we would very much like our parser construction method to tell us if we by mistake write an ambiguous grammar.

Even worse, the rules for predictive parsing as presented here might even for some unambiguous grammars give deterministic choice of production, but reject strings that actually belong to the language described by the grammar. If we, for example, change the second production in grammar 3.9 to

T -> aTb

this will not change the choices made by the predictive parser for non-terminal R. However, always choosing the last production for R on a b will lead to erroneous rejection of many strings, including ab.

This kind of behavior is clearly unacceptable. We should, at least, get a warning that this might occur, so we can rewrite the grammar or choose another syntax analysis method.

Hence, we add to our construction of predictive parsers a test that will reject all ambiguous grammars and those unambiguous grammars that can cause the parser to fail erroneously.

We have so far simply chosen a nullable production if and only if no other choice is possible. This is, however, not always the right thing to do, so we must change the rule to say that we choose a production N -> a on symbol c if one of the two conditions below are satisfied:

1)   c ∈ FIRST(α).

2)   αis nullable and the sequence Nc can occur somewhere in a derivation starting from the start symbol of the grammar.

The first rule is obvious, but the second requires a bit of explanation: If αis nullable, we can construct a syntax tree for it without reading any input, so it seems like a nullable production could be a valid choice regardless of the next input symbol.

Not only would this give multiple valid choices of production whenever there are both nullable and non-nullable productions for the same non-terminal, but it is also not always correct to choose the nullable production: Predictive parsing makes a leftmost derivation so we always rewrite the leftmost non-terminal N in the current sequence of grammar symbols. So whatever input is not matched by N must be matched by the sequence of grammar symbols that occurs after N in the current sequence. If this is not possible, we have made a bad choice when deriving N. In particular, if N derives to the empty sequence, the next input symbol c should begin the derivation of the sequence that follows N. So at the very least, the sequence of symbols that follow N should have a derivation that begins with c. If we (using a different derivation order) derive the symbols after N before deriving N, we should, hence, see the sequence Nc during the derivation. If we don’t, we cannot rewrite N to the empty sequence without later getting stuck when rewriting the remaining sequence. Since the derivation order doesn’t change the syntax tree, we can see that if the alternative derivation order gets stuck, so will the leftmost derivation order. Hence, we can only rewrite N to the empty sequence if the next input symbol c can occur in combination with N in a legal derivation. We will in the next section see how we can determine this.

Note that a nullable production N -> αcan validly be selected if c ∈FIRST(α). Even with the restriction on choosing nullable productions, we can still have situations where both nullable and non-nullable productions are valid choices. This includes the example above with the modified grammar 3.9 (since Rb can occur in a derivation) and all ambiguous grammars that are not detected as being ambiguous by the original method where we only choose nullable productions if no other choice is possible.

 

Questions of this topic


Ask your question

<
>