FE-Logo
  • Home
  • Study Material
  • Non-Deterministic Finite Automation
    • Introduction to Compiler
    • The Structure of a Compiler
    • Intermediate Code Generation
    • Building a Compiler
    • Applications of Compiler
    • Optimizations for Computer Architectures
    • Design of New Computer Architectures
    • Program Translations
    • Software Productivity Tools
    • Programming Language Basics
    • Minimisation of DFAs
    • Explicit Access Control
    • Parameter Passing Mechanisms
    • Introduction to Lexical Analysis
    • Regular expressions
    • Short hands
    • Nondeterministic finite automata
    • Converting a regular expression to an NFA
    • Deterministic finite automata
    • Converting an NFA to a DFA
    • The subset construction
    • Dead states
    • Lexers and lexer generators
    • Splitting the input stream
    • Lexical errors
    • Properties of regular languages
    • Limits to expressive power
    • The Role of the Lexical Analyzer
    • Input Buffering
    • Specification of Tokens
    • Operations on Languages
    • Regular Definitions and Extensions
    • Recognition of Tokens
    • The Lexical-Analyzer Generator Lex
    • Finite Automata
    • Construction of an NFA from a Regular Expression
    • Efficiency of String-Processing Algorithms
    • The Structure of the Generated Analyzer
    • Optimization of DFA-Based Pattern Matchers

  • Basic Parsing Techniques
    • Introduction to Syntax analysis
    • Context-free grammars
    • Writing context free grammars
    • Derivation
    • Syntax trees and ambiguity
    • Operator precedence
    • Writing ambiguous expression grammars
    • Other sources of ambiguity
    • Syntax analysis and Predictive parsing
    • Nullable and FIRST
    • Predictive parsing revisited
    • FOLLOW
    • LL(1) parsing
    • Methods for rewriting grammars for LL(1) parsing
    • SLR parsing
    • Constructions of SLR parse tables
    • Conflicts in SLR parse-tables
    • Using precedence rules in LR parse tables
    • Using LR-parser generators
    • Properties of context-free languages
    • Introduction to Syntax-Directed Translator
    • Evaluating an SDD at the Nodes of a Parse Tree
    • Evaluation Orders for SDD\'s
    • Ordering the Evaluation of Attributes
    • A larger example of calculating FIRST and FOLLOW
    • Syntax Definition
    • Associativity of Operators
    • Parse Trees
    • Ambiguity
    • Syntax-Directed Translation
    • Synthesized Attributes
    • Tree Traversals
    • Parsing
    • Predictive Parsing
    • Use e-Productions
    • Translator for Simple Expressions
    • Semantic Rules with Controlled Side Effects
    • Applications of Syntax-Directed Translation
    • The Structure of a Type of syntax
    • Switch-Statements
    • Syntax-Directed Translation Schemes
    • Postfix Translation Schemes
    • SDT\'s With Actions Inside Productions
    • Eliminating Left Recursion from SDT\'s
    • SDT\'s for L-Attributed Definitions
    • Implementing L-Attributed SDD\'s
    • On-The-Fly Code Generation
    • L-Attributed SDD\'s and LL Parsing
    • Bottom-Up Parsing of L-Attributed SDD\'s

  • Syntax-directed Translation
    • Register Allocation and Assignment
    • Semantic Analysis
    • Introduction to Intermediate Code Generation
    • Variants of Syntax Trees
    • Variants of Syntax Trees
    • The Value-Number Method for Constructing DAG\'s
    • Three-Address Code
    • Quadruples
    • Triples
    • Static Single-Assignment Form
    • Types and Declarations
    • Type Equivalence
    • Sequences of Declarations
    • Translation of Expressions
    • Incremental Translation
    • Addressing Array Elements
    • Translation of Array References
    • Type Checking
    • Type Conversions
    • Overloading of Functions and Operators
    • Type Inference and Polymorphic Functions
    • Algorithm for Unification
    • Control Flow
    • Flow-of-Control Statements
    • Control-Flow Translation of Boolean Expressions
    • Boolean Values and Jumping Code
    • Back patching
    • Backpatching for Boolean Expressions
    • Flow-of-Control Statements
    • Break-, Continue-, and Goto-Statements
    • Introduction to Run-Time Environments
    • Stack Allocation of Space
    • Activation Records
    • Calling Sequences
    • Variable-Length Data on the Stack
    • Access to Nonlocal Data on the Stack
    • Displays
    • Heap Management
    • Locality in Programs
    • Reducing Fragmentation
    • Managing and Coalescing Free Space
    • Manual Deallocation Requests
    • Reachability
    • Introduction to Garbage Collection
    • Reference Counting Garbage Collectors
    • Introduction to Trace-Based Collection
    • Basic Abstraction
    • Optimizing Mark-and-Sweep
    • Mark-and-Compact Garbage Collectors
    • Copying collectors
    • Short-Pause Garbage Collection
    • Incremental Reachability Analysis
    • Partial-Collection Basics
    • The Train Algorithm
    • Parallel and Concurrent Garbage Collection
    • Partial Object Relocation
    • Introduction Code Generation
    • Issues in the Design of a Code Generator
    • Instruction Selection
    • Register Allocation
    • The Target Language
    • Addresses in the Target Code
    • Stack Allocation
    • Run-Time Addresses for Names
    • Basic Blocks and Flow Graphs
    • Basic Blocks
    • Next-Use Information
    • Representation of Flow Graphs
    • Optimization of Basic Blocks
    • Dead Code Elimination
    • Representation of Array References
    • Pointer Assignments and Procedure Calls
    • A Simple Code Generator
    • The Code-Generation Algorithm
    • Design of the Function getReg
    • Peephole Optimization
    • Algebraic Simplification and Reduction in Strength
    • Register Assignment for Outer Loops
    • Instruction Selection by Tree Rewriting
    • Code Generation by Tiling an Input Tree
    • Pattern Matching by Parsing
    • General Tree Matching
    • Optimal Code Generation for Expressions
    • Evaluating Expressions with an Insufficient Supply of Registers
    • Dynamic Programming Code-Generation

  • Data Flow Analysis
    • The Lazy-Code-Motion Algorithm
    • Introduction to Machine-Independent Optimizations
    • The Dynamic Programming Algorithm
    • The Principal Sources of Optimization
    • Semantics-Preserving Transformations
    • Copy Propagation
    • Induction Variables and Reduction in Strength
    • Introduction to Data-Flow Analysis
    • The Data-Flow Analysis Schema
    • Reaching Definitions
    • Live-Variable Analysis
    • Available Expressions
    • Foundations of Data-Flow Analysis
    • Transfer Functions
    • The Iterative Algorithm for General Frameworks
    • Meaning of a Data-Flow Solution
    • Constant Propagation
    • Transfer Functions for the Constant-Propagation Framework
    • Partial-Redundancy Elimination
    • The Lazy-Code-Motion Problem
    • Loops in Flow Graphs
    • Depth-First Ordering
    • Back Edges and Reducibility
    • Natural Loops
    • Speed of Convergence of Iterative Data-Flow Algorithms
    • Region-Based Analysis
    • Necessary Assumptions About Transfer Functions
    • An Algorithm for Region-Based Analysis
    • Handling Non-reducible Flow Graphs
    • Symbolic Analysis
    • Data-Flow Problem Formulation
    • Region-Based Symbolic Analysis

  • Code Generation
    • Introduction to Software Pipelining of Loops
    • Matrix Multiply: An In-Depth Example
    • Software Pipelining of Loops
    • Introduction Instruction-Level Parallelism
    • Multiple Instruction Issue
    • A Basic Machine Model
    • Code-Scheduling Constraints
    • Finding Dependences Among Memory Accesses
    • Phase Ordering Between Register Allocation and Code Scheduling
    • Speculative Execution Support
    • Basic-Block Scheduling
    • List Scheduling of Basic Blocks
    • Global Code Scheduling
    • Upward Code Motion
    • Updating Data Dependences
    • Advanced Code Motion Techniques
    • Software Pipelining
    • Register Allocation and Code Generation
    • A Software-Pipelining Algorithm
    • Scheduling Cyclic Dependence Graphs
    • Improvements to the Pipelining Algorithms
    • Conditional Statements and Hardware Support for Software Pipelining
    • Basic Concepts of Parallelism and Locality
    • Parallelism in Applications
    • Loop-Level Parallelism
    • Introduction to Affine Transform Theory
    • Optimizations
    • Iteration Spaces
    • Affine Array Indexes
    • Controlling the Order of Execution
    • Changing Axes
    • Intermediate Code for Procedures
    • Data Reuse
    • Self Reuse
    • Self-Spatial Reuse
    • Array Data-Dependence Analysis
    • Integer Linear Programming
    • Heuristics for Solving Integer Linear Programs
    • Solving General Integer Linear Programs
    • Finding Synchronization-Free Parallelism
    • Affine Space Partitions
    • Space-Partition Constraints
    • Solving Space-Partition Constraints
    • A Simple Code-Generation Algorithm
    • Eliminating Empty Iterations
    • Synchronization Between Parallel Loops
    • The Parallelization Algorithm and Hierarchical Time
    • Pipelining
    • Solving Time-Partition Constraints by Farkas' Lemma
    • Code Transformations
    • Parallelism With Minimum Synchronization
    • Locality Optimizations
    • Partition Interleaving
    • Putting it All Together
    • Uses of Affine Transforms
    • Interprocedural Analysis
    • Context Sensitivity
    • Cloning-Based Context-Sensitive Analysis
    • Importance of Interprocedural Analysis
    • SQL Injection
    • A Logical Representation of Data Flow
    • Execution of Datalog Programs
    • Problematic Datalog Rules
    • A Simple Pointer-Analysis Algorithm
    • Flow Insensitivity
    • Context-Insensitive Interprocedural Analysis
    • Context-Sensitive Pointer Analysis
    • Adding Context to Datalog Rules
    • Datalog Implementation by BDD's
    • Relational Operations as BDD Operations

Branch : Computer Science and Engineering
Subject : Compiler design
Unit : Data Flow Analysis

Meaning of a Data-Flow Solution


Introduction: We now know that the solution found using the iterative algorithm is the maximum fixedpoint, but what does the result represent from a program-semantics point of view? To understand the solution of a data-flow framework (D, F, V, A), let us first describe what an ideal solution to the framework would be. We show that the ideal cannot be obtained in general, but that Algorithm 9.25 approximates the ideal conservatively.

The Ideal Solution: Without loss of generality, we shall assume for now that the data-flow frameworkof interest is a forward-flowing problem. Consider the entry point of a basicblock B. The ideal solution begins by finding all the possible execution pathsleading from the program entry to the beginning of B. A path is "possible"only if there is some computation of the program that follows exactly that path.

The ideal solution would then compute the data-flow value at the end of each possible path and apply the meet operator to these values to find their greatest lower bound. Then no execution of the program can produce a smaller value for that program point. In addition, the bound is tight; there is no greater data-flow value that is a gib for the value computed along every possible path to B in the flow graph.

We now try to define the ideal solution more formally. For each block B in a flow graph, let fB be the transfer function for B. Consider any path

P — ENTRY ->• B\ ->• B2 -»• • • • -> B k - l ->• Bk

from the initial node ENTRY to some block Bk. The program path may have cycles, so one basic block may appear several times on the path P. Define the transfer function for P, / p , to be the composition of fBl ,fB2--- > /B«,_I  Note that / B H is not part of the composition, reflecting the fact that this path is taken to reach the beginning of block Bk, not its end. The data-flow value created by executing this path is thus /P(VENTRY) , where GENTRY is the result of the constant transfer function representing the initial node ENTRY. The ideal result for block B is thus

We claim that, in terms of the lattice-theoretic partial order < for the framework in question,

• Any answer that is greater than IDEAL is incorrect.

• Any value smaller than or equal to the ideal is conservative, i.e., safe.

Intuitively, the closer the value to the ideal the more precise it is.8 To see why solutions must be < the ideal solution, note that any solution greater than IDEAL for any block could be obtained by ignoring some execution path that the program could take, and we cannot be sure that there is not some effect along that path to invalidate any program improvement we might make based on the greater solution. Conversely, any solution less than IDEAL can be viewed as including certain paths that either do not exist in the flow graph, or that exist but that the program can never follow. This lesser solution will allow only transformations that are correct for all possible executions of the program, but may forbid some transformations that IDEAL would permit.

The Meet-Over-Paths Solution: However, as discussed in Section 9.1, finding all possible execution paths isundecidable. We must therefore approximate. In the data-flow abstraction, weassume that every path in the flow graph can be taken. Thus, we can definethe meet-over-paths solution for B to be

Note that, as for IDEAL, the solution MOP[B] gives values for IN[B] in forwardflow frameworks. If we were to consider backward-flow frameworks, then we would think of MOP [B] as a value for OUT[B].

The paths considered in the MOP solution are a superset of all the paths that are possibly executed. Thus, the MOP solution meets together not only the data-flow values of all the executable paths, but also additional values associated with the paths that cannot possibly be executed. Taking the meet of the ideal solution plus additional terms cannot create a solution larger than the ideal. Thus, for all B we have MOP[B] < IDEAL[B], and we will simply say that MOP < IDEAL.

The Maximum Fixedpoint versus the MOP Solution: Notice that in the M O P solution, the number of paths considered is still unboundedif the flow graph contains cycles. Thus, the M O P definition does notlend itself to a direct algorithm. The iterative algorithm certainly does not firstfind all the paths leading to a basic block before applying the meet operator.Rather,

1.       The iterative algorithm visits basic blocks, not necessarily in the order of execution.

2.       At each confluence point, the algorithm applies the meet operator to the data-flow values obtained so far. Some of these values used were introduced artificially in the initialization process, not representing the result of any execution from the beginning of the program.

Questions of this topic


Ask your question

<
>